SACH English | Urdu       Bookmark Usbookmark us
>> contact us     |     >> FAQs     |     >> sitemap
                |     >> find us     |    
???About the ProgramDonorsNews & EventsCareersResources
Register Now
First Name 
Last Name 
Age 
Email 
 

Role of Public Safety and Police Complaints Commissions in Grievance Redress

This Commission has been assigned an important role in the selection and removal of the senior police command, but at the same time to act as insulators for the police officers against unlawful or male fide orders. In this way the Commission can make senior police hierarchy accountable for unsatisfactory performance. The original PO 2002 envisaged two separate Grievance Redress bodies, namely Public Safety Commissions (Chapters V to VII) and Police Complaints Authority (Chapter X) at Federal and Provincial levels. However, under recent amendments the Provincial Police complaints Authority has been merged with the Public Safety Commission. The reconstituted body is known as Provincial Public Safety & Police Complaints Commission. It is important to note that through these amendments the concept of Police Complaint Commission has also been introduced at District Level by reconstituting District Public Safety Commissions as District Public Safety & Police Complaints Commissions.

The National Public Safety Commission and Provincial Public Safety and Police Complaints Commission will be headed by the Interior and Home Minister with powers of recommendation, so it is yet to be seen to what extent the Commission will b effective in its functioning. It is also perceived in some quarters that this body will dilute the authority of provincial governments, which are constitutionally responsible for the maintenance of law and order in the provinces. Since government minister with recommendatory powers heads the Commission, its effectiveness will largely depend upon the political will of the provincial and federal governments. Its oversight functions are liable to be compromised and its PGR role will not expand. An alternate viewpoint sees it as a self-serving and superfluous argument from the vested interests, who wanted control over micro-management of policing decisions, e.g. transfers and posting rather than monitoring quality of service and performance. They don’t want to concede operational autonomy and view the changes as zero sum game. However, recent amendments in Police Order seemingly expand the grievance redress function of the district Commissions.

 
Home  |  About the Project  |  Donors  |  News & Events  |  Careers  |  Resources
©2012 Sach Struggle for Change. All rights reserved.