 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Role of Public Safety and Police Complaints Commissions in
Grievance Redress
This Commission has
been assigned an important role in the
selection and removal of the senior police
command, but at the same time to act as
insulators for the police officers against
unlawful or male fide orders. In this way
the Commission can make senior police
hierarchy accountable for unsatisfactory
performance. The original PO 2002 envisaged
two separate Grievance Redress bodies,
namely Public Safety Commissions (Chapters V
to VII) and Police Complaints Authority
(Chapter X) at Federal and Provincial
levels. However, under recent amendments the
Provincial Police complaints Authority has
been merged with the Public Safety
Commission. The reconstituted body is known
as Provincial Public Safety & Police
Complaints Commission. It is important to
note that through these amendments the
concept of Police Complaint Commission has
also been introduced at District Level by
reconstituting District Public Safety
Commissions as District Public Safety &
Police Complaints Commissions.
The National Public
Safety Commission and Provincial Public
Safety and Police Complaints Commission will
be headed by the Interior and Home Minister
with powers of recommendation, so it is yet
to be seen to what extent the Commission
will b effective in its functioning. It is
also perceived in some quarters that this
body will dilute the authority of provincial
governments, which are constitutionally
responsible for the maintenance of law and
order in the provinces. Since government
minister with recommendatory powers heads
the Commission, its effectiveness will
largely depend upon the political will of
the provincial and federal governments. Its
oversight functions are liable to be
compromised and its PGR role will not
expand. An alternate viewpoint sees it as a
self-serving and superfluous argument from
the vested interests, who wanted control
over micro-management of policing decisions,
e.g. transfers and posting rather than
monitoring quality of service and
performance. They don’t want to concede
operational autonomy and view the changes as
zero sum game. However, recent amendments in
Police Order seemingly expand the grievance
redress function of the district
Commissions.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|